“The universe as a whole” by the very meaning of this concept, there can only be “static”. because, that the very concept of time, what is necessary to talk about evolution does not apply to her. However, the idea of ​​evolution works so well when describing a lot of experimental facts.… Is there a contradiction here?

Evolutionism, the concept of evolution today is an organic part of our worldview, at least, scientific. Most people most likely associate theory primarily with the concept of evolution. Charles Darwin about the origin of species. but, in our time, ideas about the evolution of not only life forms, but also, eg, all over our planet, stars, public relations and much more are quite common. Yes, Darwin's theory is one of the most striking examples of the consistent application of the concept of the inevitability and properties of the evolution of life on our planet. Her success created a certain myth about the identity of the concepts of evolution and progress.. Of course, this is by no means a universal belief, but a fairly widespread opinion. In fact, there are much closer parallels in terms of evolution and time.. As a matter of fact, when considering time as a sequence of interrelated events, local, linked to the idea of ​​existence in such (his own) time of an arbitrary object, allocated in the real world, these concepts almost merge. After all, the sequence of events, which take place when the object exists, it realizes as its own time, and its evolution. This is reflected directly in the quantum description. – the state of a quantum object can be described by the evolution operator. It is this closeness, almost identity of the concepts of time and evolution and makes the evolutionary approach to describing the world inevitable and fruitful. Any naturally allocated object in the world, whether it be a galaxy, star system, star, planet, or something even less can be considered in the process of its evolution. There, where is the place of time, evolution and time – two inseparable concepts. but, when there is no way to talk about time, there is also no way to talk about evolution. And vice versa. Even when, seemingly, with object, for which the passage of time is considered absolutely nothing happens. In fact it always happens. After all, time is always a sequence of events, not something abstract. Even if it's a sequence of the same events, it will still be a special case of the evolution of this object.

In physics, the evolution of objects in the world is not identified with progress, understood as an increase in the complexity of its organization. The possibility of changing certain objects in the process of their existence, both towards the complication of their structure, and in the direction of simplification or even final disintegration, there is no doubt. Just as it is permissible and long enough invariability of the structure of any object of physics. It all depends on the initial structure of the object itself and on “its habitat”, ie. from the totality of influences, produced by the outside world. If you look closely at that, what happens to living systems, then no fundamental difference can be noticed. There, too, evolution can go in any direction.. Can happen as progress, and degradation. There are already a lot of examples of the simplification of organisms in the process of evolution.. And the degradation is almost instantaneous, causing the object to disappear, in general, the phenomenon is well known to everyone. How many species of animals have already disappeared in the memory of mankind? Therefore, the association of evolution and progress is a purely subjective phenomenon., associated precisely with focusing only on progress.

I will repeat again – as a matter of fact, description of the existence of any objects, parts of the real world using space-time is a description of their evolution. Of all, with one exception. Then, what is applicable to part, not applicable to the whole. If you have already read the article “The universe as a whole. Big bangin“, you know that, what in relation to the universe as a whole, one cannot say, that she exists, develops or evolves over time. Just because, that the universe is space-time, which in time cannot be considered. This means that any view of the Universe is inherently static., covers everything in general, and the past, and present, and the future together. The words – past, present and future – these are words about us, as part of the universe, and not about the universe itself. So that “Evolution of the Universe” this is nonsense… However, in this sense, it is just as wrong to talk about “static” The universe. Staticity also implies the ability to apply the concept of time to an object.. That's why I put this word in quotes..

© Gavryusev V.G.
The materials published on the site can be used subject to the citation rules.